February 10, 2009...2:12 pm

How globalization killed America… and the world.

Jump to Comments

So let’s see how this works…

By Jack E. Lohman

Picture two water glasses, one 90% full and the other 10%. It’s our disproportionate world. Some very rich, some very poor. It’d be nice to make them all the same, for different reasons. It could be the right thing to do, or a chance to make a lot of money for someone.

Protectionism is like leaving the glasses separate. Every country for themselves. No exports, no imports. Small businesses and people who lost their job to outsourcing prefer this.

Those supporting globalization have put a tube between the glasses and let the assets level between them. Problem is, the tube is too wide and unrestricted, and assets are leveling too fast. Jobs are leaving our country faster than we can create replacements, but the perpetrators are doing just fine, thank you.

Unemployment is up, people are losing their health care and banks are foreclosing on their houses.

But some executives are laughing all the way to the bank. The CEOs that sent the jobs to China and India — and reduced their manufacturing costs and increased profits, and their salaries and bonuses and golden parachutes — are so tickled that they shared their wealth with the politicians who agreed not to intervene.

You know, the guys that let it all happen and who rail on the public that it was the right thing to do. The co-conspirators.

The politicians are happy because the campaign contributions keep coming in and help them keep a job that gives them power and wealth. So they tell us “globalization will ceate jobs,” but they hide that they’ll be in China and India.

Live with it, or fix it! Wisconsin’s 100% re-election of congressional members does not represent change.

Tidbits:

  • Like all political problems, this one was created solely by corrupt campaign money. With public funding of campaigns the tube would have been appropriately adjusted, but the politicians sold out their constituents for cash dollars.
  • What matters are jobs, and only jobs, and they must be brought back to the US. New jobs must be prohibited from being outsourced, especially by bailed out companies. Tax cuts benefit only those with jobs.
  • Tariffs must be applied both as a source of income and as a deterrent. Corporations that outsource must be penalized with a higher taxes or tariffs.
  • Rebuilding government buildings and roads creates temporary jobs when we need permanent manufacturing jobs. Jobs that last more than two years, or we’ll soon be doing this again.
  • It’s not a pretty sight for anyone except the CEOs who got $10 million bonuses for trashing their own companies and the nation’s economy with it. That’s the kind of job I want.
  • Obviously they shouldn’t have deregulated the banks in 1999, and they should have outlawed Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) as usury, and banned the selling of consolidated toxic loan packages. But congress was being paid to turn a blind eye, and they did.
  • I generally am a free market capitalist, but I draw the line on allowing one segment of the population to rip off another. Our free-for-all system — without regulations and laws to protect those unwilling to join the dog-eat-dog world of survival — has trashed the US and worldwide economy.
  • Fair trade is preferred over free trade.
  • 2 Comments

    • Jack…

      Thanx for such a nice post, glad to see you here!

      I agree entirely with your line of thinking…it has been part of my thinking ever since I read Wallerstein’s seminal article back in the 1970s called “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System” (Comparative Studies in Society and History). I don’t remember the exact issue but I sure wish I could find a copy of it because so much of what he said is apropos these days.

      Instead of dealing with a single division of labor, within a national boundary, Wallerstein argued that there was a world division of labor among rich and poor countries. He describes the origin of the modern world capitalist system from its colonial origins in four volumes…very well documented. The wealth of the western European colonial nations, and of the US, was based on boundaries that defined rights of citizenship and allocated these rights to a privileged minority while people in the Third World countries were exploited. They were paid minimal wages and their countries were robbed of natural resources and raw materials by entrepreneurs of the “developed” nations.

      It was very unfair. I do think that globalization has made the world slightly more democratic on a nation-to-nation basis, but there is a new upper class of capitalistic entrepreneurs, a global elite, that are much, much richer than ever before.

      In my way of thinking, because we live on a planet of finite resources, we need some sort of new ethic, a non-materialistic ethic, a different set of values on which to base quality of life. Capitalism has become the new religion, the single common denominator of world citizenship, and we need something better, something more fulfilling and equitable.

      Respectfully,

      Magdaleyna

    • Thanks Magdaleyna. I am far from expert on the whole issue of globalization and its full effects on society, and for that matter, the whole stimulous bill and what parts are right and wrong.

      But I am expert on the effects of money (bribes) given to politicians, and I know that it works or it wouldn’t be given. CEOs are a lot of things, but they are not stupid and they generally do not send money where it doesn’t produce results.

      And it’s those results (bribes) that have created the financial turmoil we face today. If bribes were not given to politicians, I virtually would not care what party was in power because I’d know that they’d have the public’s best interest in mind, and they’d do the right thing as opposed to the most profitable thing (to themselves),


    Leave a Reply